Skip to content

The True Cost of Food Fraud: How HorizonScan Protects Your Brand and Bottom Line

Food fraud poses an invisible yet pervasive threat to global supply chains, costing the food industry an estimated £25-30 billion annually, according to the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA). From the dilution of olive oil to the substitution of seafood species, fraudulent activities jeopardise food safety, erode customer trust, and wreak havoc on a business's reputation.

A single instance of food fraud can devastate a company. In fact, 58% of businesses impacted by food fraud report a decline in brand reputation, according to a study by PwC. With such high stakes, proactive strategies to mitigate food fraud risks are more critical than ever.

This blog explores the true cost of food fraud, highlights high-risk areas in supply chains, and explains how HorizonScan provides businesses with the insights needed to stay ahead of these challenges and protect their brands.

What is Food Fraud?

Food fraud refers to the intentional adulteration, substitution, tampering, or misrepresentation of food, ingredients, or packaging for financial gain. Unlike food safety incidents, which are typically accidental, food fraud is deliberate and often difficult to detect.

Some common examples include:

  • Adulteration: Adding cheaper substances, such as water or starch, to bulk up products (e.g., honey diluted with sugar syrup).
  • Substitution: Replacing an expensive ingredient with a lower-quality alternative (e.g., substituting cheaper fish for cod).
  • Mislabeling: Selling products under false claims, such as organic certification or incorrect country of origin.
  • Counterfeiting: Reproducing and selling fake versions of branded products.

The Cost of Food Fraud to Businesses

The financial impact of food fraud extends far beyond the initial act of deception. Its ripple effects can devastate companies across multiple areas:

  1. Financial Losses

Food fraud incidents often lead to recalls, lawsuits, and fines. According to the Food Marketing Institute (FMI), the average cost of a product recall in the food industry is £8 million—not including the cost of lost sales and customer loyalty.

Case Study: Horsemeat Scandal (2013)

In 2013, major retailers and food manufacturers across Europe were implicated in a widespread scandal where horsemeat was mislabelled as beef. Some retailers reported losing up to 43% of their sales in affected product categories, while companies like Tesco and Findus faced enormous reputational damage. The incident highlighted the critical need for robust supply chain monitoring systems.

  1. Brand and Reputation Damage

Rebuilding consumer trust after a food fraud incident can take years. A survey by PwC found that 39% of food businesses affected by fraud lost market share, and 49% reported a lasting decline in customer trust.

Case Study: The Melamine Scandal (2008)

In China, baby formula adulterated with melamine caused severe health issues and led to six infant deaths. The scandal resulted in widespread consumer distrust, with some brands losing their market share entirely. This tragedy underscored the importance of proactive ingredient monitoring and supplier vetting.

  1. Regulatory Penalties

Governments worldwide are tightening food safety regulations to combat fraud, such as the U.S. Food Safety Modernisation Act (FSMA). 

For example, in 2020, the U.S. FDA issued over 120 warning letters for food fraud violations under FSMA, emphasising the importance of robust risk management systems.

  1. Supply Chain Disruption

Uncovering fraudulent activity often requires a complete reassessment of suppliers and sourcing practices, leading to delays, increased costs, and operational disruptions.


High-Risk Areas for Food Fraud

While food fraud can occur anywhere in the supply chain, certain ingredients and regions are more vulnerable due to their economic value or geographic risk factors.

High-Risk Ingredients

  • Honey and Syrups: 14% of global honey is adulterated, according to the European Commission.
  • Seafood: The Oceana report found that one in five seafood samples globally is mislabelled, with cheaper species often substituted for premium ones.
  • Spices and Herbs: A study by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) revealed that 27% of oregano samples were adulterated with non-food substances such as olive leaves.
  • Olive Oil: The Food Fraud Database ranks olive oil as one of the top five most commonly adulterated foods, often diluted with cheaper oils.
shutterstock_2473679695

High-Risk Regions

  • Countries with Weak Regulatory Oversight: Developing nations often lack robust food safety regulations, increasing the risk of fraud.
  • Regions Facing Supply Chain Pressure: Economic instability, natural disasters, or political unrest can drive fraudulent activity as suppliers attempt to meet demand.

How HorizonScan Protects Against Food Fraud

HorizonScan is a powerful risk management tool designed to help businesses identify and mitigate food fraud risks before they escalate into costly incidents. Here’s how HorizonScan addresses key pain points associated with food fraud:

  1. Comprehensive Ingredient Risk Analysis

HorizonScan provides a detailed database of historical risks for over 500 ingredients. This enables businesses to assess the likelihood of fraud for specific ingredients and prioritise high-risk areas in their supply chain.

Example: A company sourcing honey can use HorizonScan to identify regions and suppliers with a history of adulteration, ensuring they only partner with trustworthy sources.

  1. Real-Time Alerts on Fraud Incidents

With HorizonScan’s global monitoring system, businesses receive daily notifications of food fraud incidents as they occur. This allows companies to take immediate action to safeguard their supply chains.

Case Study: Recalls for a number of products containing mustard because they may be contaminated with peanut (2024)

In 2024, HorizonScan alerted its users to a precautionary recall of products containing mustard due to potential peanut contamination—over 24 hours before the news broke in mainstream media. What began as a precaution swiftly escalated into a full-scale investigation into allergen risks associated with numerous mustard-based products.

  1. Supplier Risk Monitoring

HorizonScan provides insights into supplier performance, including a record of non-compliances and potential vulnerabilities. This helps businesses make informed decisions about who they partner with.


The Benefits of Proactive Food Fraud Prevention

By incorporating HorizonScan into their risk management strategies, businesses can achieve significant benefits:


Financial Savings


Brand Protection

Supply Chain Resilience

Avoiding just one product recall can offset the cost of HorizonScan many times over. Proactively addressing fraud also reduces legal and operational costs.


Consumers are more likely to trust brands that prioritise transparency and integrity. HorizonScan helps businesses maintain their reputation by ensuring a secure and trustworthy supply chain.


By identifying high-risk ingredients, suppliers, and regions, HorizonScan strengthens supply chain resilience and reduces dependency on risky sources.

 


Conclusion: Protect Your Brand and Bottom Line with HorizonScan

Food fraud is an ever-present risk, but its consequences are far from inevitable. With HorizonScan, businesses gain the insights and tools needed to proactively address fraud risks, protect their supply chains, and safeguard their reputations.

By leveraging HorizonScan’s comprehensive data, companies can turn risk management into a competitive advantage.

Ready to take control of your supply chain risks? Contact us today to learn how HorizonScan can help you build a fraud-free future.